Question · asked by 1 review
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection: Motor fusion test
- Population
- people with intermittent exotropia, aged 3 to < 11 years
- Intervention
- Bilateral lateral rectus recession
- Comparison
- lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
- Outcome
- Motor fusion test
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection Motor fusion test · people with intermittent exotropia, aged 3 to < 11 years The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for intermittent exotropia (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for intermittent exotropia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.