Intrauterine insemination vs intracervical insemination: Live birth rate
It is very uncertain whether intrauterine insemination changes live birth rate compared with intracervical insemination (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intrauterine insemination vs intracervical insemination Live birth rate · women starting donor sperm treatment It is very uncertain whether intrauterine insemination changes live birth rate compared with intracervical insemination (very low certainty). Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 3.24 [0.12, 87.13] | 1 study · 26 participants | Very low |
Intrauterine insemination vs intracervical insemination Live birth rate · women who are starting donor sperm treatment It is very uncertain whether intrauterine insemination changes live birth rate compared with intracervical insemination (very low certainty). Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 2.55 [0.72, 8.96] | 1 study · 43 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.