Question · asked by 1 review
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces: Peri-implantitis
- Population
- Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
- Intervention
- Turned (smoother) implant surfaces
- Comparison
- Roughened implant surfaces
- Outcome
- Peri-implantitis
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces may leads to lower peri-implantitis compared with roughened implant surfaces (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 75%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces Peri-implantitis · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed dental implants, functionally loaded and followed… · 3 years, turned vs roughened surfaces Turned (smoother) implant surfaces may leads to lower peri-implantitis compared with roughened implant surfaces (low certainty). Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 0.80 [0.67, 0.96] | 4 studies · 144 participants | Low |
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces Peri-implantitis · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for… · 3 years, turned vs roughened surfaces Turned (smoother) implant surfaces led to lower peri-implantitis compared with roughened implant surfaces; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003815.PUB3, superseded | RR 0.80 [0.67, 0.96] | 3 studies · 155 participants | GRADE not reported |
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces Peri-implantitis · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for… · 3 years, turned vs roughened surfaces Turned (smoother) implant surfaces led to lower peri-implantitis compared with roughened implant surfaces; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants (2005) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003815.PUB2, superseded | RR 0.80 [0.67, 0.96] | 3 studies · 155 participants | GRADE not reported |
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces Peri-implantitis · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for… · 3 years, turned vs roughened surfaces Turned (smoother) implant surfaces showed no clear difference in peri-implantitis compared with roughened implant surfaces; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants (2003) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003815, superseded | RR 0.27 [0.05, 1.57] | 2 studies · 103 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.