Question · asked by 0 reviews
Hypnosis vs Sedation (sedative agent alone): Adverse events
- Population
- Children and adolescents (0 to 16 years) needing dental treatment
- Intervention
- Hypnosis
- Comparison
- Sedation (sedative agent alone)
- Outcome
- Adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hypnosis vs Sedation (sedative agent alone) Adverse events · Children and adolescents up to 16 years of age undergoing dental treatment The review found no eligible studies for this question. Hypnosis for children undergoing dental treatment (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD007154, superseded | Protocol-planned outcome: adverse events. No studies (protocol stage). | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis for children undergoing dental treatment 2010 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2010-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Hypnosis vs WAIT LIST · people with conversion disorder according to DSM‐IV or ICD‐10 criteria · 1 review
- Hypnosis vs diazepam · people with conversion disorder according to DSM‐IV or ICD‐10 criteria · 1 review
- Hypnosis vs No hypnosis (no hypnotic intervention) · Children undergoing dental and orthodontic treatment (Gokli 1994; Trakyali 2008) · 1 review
- Hypnosis vs relaxation · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer · 1 review
- Hypnosis vs Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide and oxygen · Children aged 10 to 16 years undergoing orthodontic extractions (Braithwaite 2005) · 1 review
- Hypnosis vs No hypnosis (no hypnotic intervention) · Children and adolescents (0 to 16 years) needing dental treatment · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.