Question · asked by 1 review

Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces: All reported adverse events

Population
pressure ulcer prevention
Intervention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces
Comparison
foam surfaces
Outcome
All reported adverse events

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces vs foam surfaces
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted3 studies · 2181 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.