Question · asked by 1 review
Vertical distraction osteogenesis vs Autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus): Augmentation procedure (partial) failure
- Population
- Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants
- Intervention
- Vertical distraction osteogenesis
- Comparison
- Autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus)
- Outcome
- Augmentation procedure (partial) failure
Vertical distraction osteogenesis showed no clear difference in augmentation procedure (partial) failure compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus); GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Vertical distraction osteogenesis vs Autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus) Augmentation procedure (partial) failure · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants · Up to 3 years post-loading Vertical distraction osteogenesis showed no clear difference in augmentation procedure (partial) failure compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus); GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes | OR 0.88 [0.05, 16.74] | 1 study · 17 participants | GRADE not reported |
Vertical distraction osteogenesis vs Autogenous onlay bone graft (mandibular ramus) Augmentation procedure (partial) failure · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants · Up to 3 years post-loading Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003607.PUB3, superseded | No statistically significant difference (Chiapasco 2007) | 1 study · 17 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.