Question · asked by 1 review
Chlorhexidine varnish vs placebo or no treatment: Dental caries: dmfs increment (primary teeth)
- Population
- Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with mixed, permanent or primary dentition, moderate to high caries risk
- Intervention
- Chlorhexidine varnish
- Comparison
- placebo or no treatment
- Outcome
- Dental caries: dmfs increment (primary teeth)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Chlorhexidine varnish (1%, 10% or 40%) vs Placebo or no treatment Caries increment in the primary teeth (d(m)fs/t) · Children and adolescents below 18 years at study start (included studies: children from birth to 15 years), with… · 24 months, primary dentition Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes | Two trials with unit of analysis problem. Data imputations indicated no evidence to claim or refute a benefit | 2 studies · 471 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2015-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.