Question · asked by 1 review
Elemental formula supplements vs no supplementation: Serious adverse events
- Population
- Participants with Crohn's disease in remission
- Intervention
- Elemental formula supplements
- Comparison
- no supplementation
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Elemental formula supplements vs no supplementation Serious adverse events · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 51 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Elemental formula supplements vs polymeric formula supplements · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.