Question · asked by 1 review
In-office laser therapy (all types combined) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment: Patient-reported quality of life
- Population
- Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation
- Intervention
- In-office laser therapy (all types combined)
- Comparison
- Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment
- Outcome
- Patient-reported quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
In-office laser therapy (all types combined) vs Placebo (placebo laser or placebo agent) or no treatment Patient-reported quality of life · Patients aged above 12 years with self-reported tooth hypersensitivity confirmed on clinical evaluation The review found no eligible studies for this question. Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | Outcome not measured in any of the included studies | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2020-10 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.