Question · asked by 1 review

38% SDF (every 6 months) vs no treatment: Inactive (arrested) carious lesions on permanent first molars

Population
Children with dental caries in permanent (first) molars
Intervention
38% SDF (every 6 months)
Comparison
no treatment
Outcome
Inactive (arrested) carious lesions on permanent first molars

Six-monthly SDF produced significantly more inactive (arrested) lesions than no treatment in children's permanent molars (0.3 vs 0.1; p<0.05; ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
38% SDF (every 6 months) vs No treatment
Inactive (arrested) carious lesions on permanent first molars · Children with dental caries in permanent (first) molars · 36 months, School-based (children), Llodra 2005
Six-monthly SDF produced significantly more inactive (arrested) lesions than no treatment in children's permanent molars (0.3 vs 0.1; p<0.05; ungraded).
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes
Mean inactive lesions per child 0.31 study · 452 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth.
2023 All outcomes
December 202213Low / Critically Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.