Question · asked by 1 review

Lung cancer screening with chest radiography +/‐ sputum cytology vs less intense screening: All‐cause mortality ‐ More frequent chest x‐ray screening versus less frequent screening

Lung cancer screening with chest radiography +/‐ sputum cytology showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ More frequent chest x‐ray screening versus… compared with less intense screening (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Lung cancer screening with chest radiography +/‐ sputum cytology vs less intense screening
All‐cause mortality ‐ More frequent chest x‐ray screening versus less frequent screening · Patients with lung cancer
Lung cancer screening with chest radiography +/‐ sputum cytology showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ More frequent chest x‐ray screening versus… compared with less intense screening (low certainty).
Screening for lung cancer (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.94, 1.08]4 studies · 170149 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Screening for lung cancer
2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.