Question · asked by 1 review
CBT‐combined vs control: Observer‐reported pain
- Population
- children aged 3‐18 years with mixed medical (acute or chronic illness) or generally healthy undergoing immunization, intravenous insertion, venipuncture, bone marrow aspiration, insulin injection, or dental local anesthetic
- Intervention
- CBT‐combined
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Observer‐reported pain
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CBT‐combined vs control Observer‐reported pain · children aged 3‐18 years with mixed medical (acute or chronic illness) or generally healthy undergoing immunization,… Psychological interventions for needle‐related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 385 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological interventions for needle‐related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.