Question · asked by 1 review
Coated superelastic NiTi wire (BioCosmetic, Titanol, TP Aesthetic or Tooth Tone) vs A different coated superelastic NiTi wire: Alignment rate
- Population
- People receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (upper and/or lower full arch)
- Intervention
- Coated superelastic NiTi wire (BioCosmetic, Titanol, TP Aesthetic or Tooth Tone)
- Comparison
- A different coated superelastic NiTi wire
- Outcome
- Alignment rate
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Coated superelastic NiTi wire (BioCosmetic, Titanol, TP Aesthetic or Tooth Tone) vs A different coated superelastic NiTi wire Alignment rate · People receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (upper and/or lower full arch) · 8 weeks Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (2024) · Cochrane All outcomes | Four-arm study of different coated superelastic NiTi wires (Ulhaq 2017); reduction in LII over 8 weeks; no difference between the four groups (ANOVA P=0.627) | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances 2024 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2022-07-04 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.