Question · asked by 1 review
PROMPT TYPE vs NO PROMPT: Did not attend appointment ‐ text‐based prompts
- Population
- people with severe mental disorders
- Intervention
- PROMPT TYPE
- Comparison
- NO PROMPT
- Outcome
- Did not attend appointment ‐ text‐based prompts
PROMPT TYPE showed no clear difference in did not attend appointment ‐ text‐based prompts compared with NO PROMPT (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PROMPT TYPE vs NO PROMPT Did not attend appointment ‐ text‐based prompts · patients with serious mental illness PROMPT TYPE showed no clear difference in did not attend appointment ‐ text‐based prompts compared with NO PROMPT (moderate certainty). Prompts to encourage appointment attendance for people with serious mental illness (2001) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.76 [0.43, 1.32] | 3 studies · 326 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompts to encourage appointment attendance for people with serious mental illness 2001 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.