On site voluntary testing and counselling vs Voucher: Uptake of testing
On site voluntary testing and counselling probably leads to higher uptake of testing compared with voucher (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
On site voluntary testing and counselling vs Voucher Uptake of testing · patients with uptake of HIV testing On site voluntary testing and counselling probably leads to higher uptake of testing compared with voucher (moderate certainty). Interventions to reduce risky sexual behaviour for preventing HIV infection in workers in occupational… (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 14 [11.75, 16.68] | 1 study · 7482 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions to reduce risky sexual behaviour for preventing HIV infection in workers in occupational settings 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.