Question · asked by 1 review
Maternal smoking during pregnancy vs No maternal smoking during pregnancy: Dental caries in children
- Population
- Children in cross-sectional studies from Asia
- Intervention
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy
- Comparison
- No maternal smoking during pregnancy
- Outcome
- Dental caries in children
Maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with higher odds of childhood caries in the Asia subgroup.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Maternal smoking during pregnancy vs No maternal smoking during pregnancy Childhood dental caries · Children in cross-sectional studies from Asia · Asia, Study region: Asia Maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with higher odds of childhood caries in the Asia subgroup. Correlation Between Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Dental Caries in Children: A Systematic Review and… (2021) All outcomes | OR 1.84 [1.39, 2.45] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation Between Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Dental Caries in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2021 All outcomes | March 29, 2021 | 11 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy vs No maternal smoking during pregnancy · Children of mothers assessed for smoking status during pregnancy (early childhood dental… · 1 review
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy vs No maternal smoking during pregnancy · Children in cross-sectional studies · 1 review
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy vs No maternal smoking during pregnancy · Children in cross-sectional studies from Europe · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.