Question · asked by 0 reviews
Iridotomy vs no iridotomy: Quality of life measures
- Population
- patients with primary angle‐closure suspect, primary angle closure, or primary angle‐closure glaucoma
- Intervention
- Iridotomy
- Comparison
- no iridotomy
- Outcome
- Quality of life measures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Iridotomy vs no iridotomy Quality of life measures · patients with primary angle‐closure suspect, primary angle closure, or primary angle‐closure glaucoma The review found no eligible studies for this question. Iridotomy to slow progression of visual field loss in angle‐closure glaucoma (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD012270.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iridotomy to slow progression of visual field loss in angle‐closure glaucoma 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Iridotomy vs no iridotomy · people with primary angle‐closure suspect · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.