Question · asked by 1 review
Cognitive‐behavioural intervention vs controls: Fatigue
- Population
- patients with fibromyalgia
- Intervention
- Cognitive‐behavioural intervention
- Comparison
- controls
- Outcome
- Fatigue
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive behavioural therapies vs controls Fatigue · Patients with fibromyalgia Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 429 participants | Low |
Cognitive behavioural therapies vs controls Fatigue end of treatment (0‐10 scale) Higher scores indicate higher fatigue levels · Patients with fibromyalgia Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 910 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.