Question · asked by 1 review

An extended antiretroviral regimen administered to mothers for 28 weeks vs 1 week of antiretroviral prophylaxis: Infant mortality at 28 weeks among those whose diagnostic testing was negative at 2 weeks after birth

Population
HIV‐infected mothers and their breastfeeding infants
Intervention
An extended antiretroviral regimen administered to mothers for 28 weeks
Comparison
1 week of antiretroviral prophylaxis
Outcome
Infant mortality at 28 weeks among those whose diagnostic testing was negative at 2 weeks after birth

An extended antiretroviral regimen administered to mothers for 28… showed no clear difference in infant mortality at 28 weeks among those whose diagnostic testing… compared with 1 week of antiretroviral prophylaxis (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
An extended antiretroviral regimen administered to mothers for 28 weeks vs 1 week of antiretroviral prophylaxis
Infant mortality at 28 weeks among those whose diagnostic testing was negative at 2 weeks after birth · HIV‐infected mothers and their breastfeeding infants
An extended antiretroviral regimen administered to mothers for 28… showed no clear difference in infant mortality at 28 weeks among those whose diagnostic testing… compared with 1 week of antiretroviral prophylaxis (low certainty).
Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.67 [0.31, 1.45]1 study · 1517 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV
2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.