Question · asked by 1 review

Fluconazole (absorbed from GI tract) vs Ketoconazole (absorbed from GI tract): Mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis

Population
Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with overt oral candidiasis
Intervention
Fluconazole (absorbed from GI tract)
Comparison
Ketoconazole (absorbed from GI tract)
Outcome
Mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis

Fluconazole (absorbed from GI tract) showed no clear difference in mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis compared with ketoconazole (absorbed from GI tract); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluconazole (absorbed from GI tract) vs Ketoconazole (absorbed from GI tract)
Mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with overt oral candidiasis
Fluconazole (absorbed from GI tract) showed no clear difference in mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis compared with ketoconazole (absorbed from GI tract); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for treating oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2010) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.95 [0.52, 1.72]1 study · 37 participantsGRADE not reported
Fluconazole (absorbed from GI tract) vs Ketoconazole (absorbed from GI tract)
Mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with overt oral candidiasis
Fluconazole (absorbed from GI tract) showed no clear difference in mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis compared with ketoconazole (absorbed from GI tract); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for treating oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD001972.PUB3, superseded
RR 0.95 [0.52, 1.72]1 study · 37 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for treating oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
2010 · Cochrane All outcomes
2010-06Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.