Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings table – disulfiram vs placebo or no pharmacological treatment: Dropouts due to adverse events

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table – disulfiram changes dropout due to adverse events (number of participants who did not… compared with placebo or no pharmacological treatment (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings table – disulfiram vs placebo or no pharmacological treatment
Dropout due to adverse events (number of participants who did not complete treatment due to adverse events) · people with cocaine dependence
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table – disulfiram changes dropout due to adverse events (number of participants who did not… compared with placebo or no pharmacological treatment (very low certainty).
Disulfiram for the treatment of cocaine dependence (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 12.97 [0.77, 218.37]1 study · 67 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Disulfiram for the treatment of cocaine dependence
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.