Question · asked by 1 review
Clindamycin + SRP vs SRP: Adverse events
- Population
- Adults with aggressive periodontitis
- Intervention
- Clindamycin + SRP
- Comparison
- SRP
- Outcome
- Adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Clindamycin + SRP vs SRP Adverse events · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | Included study has not reported adverse events | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2020-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Clindamycin + SRP vs Doxycycline + SRP · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · 1 review
- Clindamycin + SRP vs Metronidazole + SRP · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.