Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy: Effectiveness Proportion of women with perception of improvement of bleeding symptoms
Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to lower effectiveness Woman's perception (proportion with improvement in… compared with open hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy Effectiveness Woman's perception (proportion with improvement in bleeding symptoms) · HMB Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to lower effectiveness Woman's perception (proportion with improvement in… compared with open hysterectomy (moderate certainty). Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.9 [0.84, 0.95] | 2 studies · 247 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.