Question · asked by 1 review

TiO2-modified composite (1 wt.%) vs Control composite in contralateral quadrant: Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score)

Population
Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
Intervention
TiO2-modified composite (1 wt.%)
Comparison
Control composite in contralateral quadrant
Outcome
Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score)

TiO2-modified composite favored lower DIAGNOdent scores, with certainty not graded.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
TiO2-modified composite (1 wt.%) vs Control composite in contralateral quadrant
Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score) · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 1 to 6 months after bonding, Fixed orthodontic treatment
TiO2-modified composite favored lower DIAGNOdent scores, with certainty not graded.
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
Mean readings were significantly greater on the control side than on the experimental side (p < 0.001) at all time points except at baseline.1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.