Question · asked by 1 review

Vitrectomy vs scleral buckling: Quality of life (satisfaction with vision) at least 3 months after operation

It is very uncertain whether pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) changes quality of life (satisfaction with vision) at least 3 months after… compared with scleral buckling (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) vs scleral buckling
Quality of life (satisfaction with vision) at least 3 months after operation · people with simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
It is very uncertain whether pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) changes quality of life (satisfaction with vision) at least 3 months after… compared with scleral buckling (very low certainty).
Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 6.22 [0.88, 44.09]1 study · 32 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.