Question · asked by 1 review

Surface‐modified vs standard catheter: Vascular access complications

Surface‐modified showed no clear difference in vascular access complications compared with standard double‐lumen catheter with identical geometry and flow design (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Surface‐modified vs standard double‐lumen catheter with identical geometry and flow design
Vascular access complications · AKI patients receiving CKRT
Surface‐modified showed no clear difference in vascular access complications compared with standard double‐lumen catheter with identical geometry and flow design (low certainty).
Non‐pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.33 [0.09, 1.2]1 study · 236 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Non‐pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.