Question · asked by 1 review
Infant Flow CPAP vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP): Neurodevelopmental outcomes
- Population
- preterm infants with apnea
- Intervention
- Infant Flow CPAP
- Comparison
- continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
- Outcome
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Infant Flow CPAP vs Medijet CPAP Long‐term neurodevelopmental outcomes · preterm infants with apnoea of prematurity (gestation 27 weeks, age not stated) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for apnoea of prematurity (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for apnoea of prematurity 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.