Question · asked by 1 review
Prompts: Telephone prompt vs TEXT‐BASED PROMPTS (ORIENTATION STATEMENT): Did not attend appointment
- Population
- people with severe mental disorders
- Intervention
- Prompts: Telephone prompt
- Comparison
- TEXT‐BASED PROMPTS (ORIENTATION STATEMENT)
- Outcome
- Did not attend appointment
It is very uncertain whether TELEPHONE PROMPTS changes did not attend appointment compared with TEXT‐BASED PROMPTS (ORIENTATION STATEMENT) (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
TELEPHONE PROMPTS vs TEXT‐BASED PROMPTS (ORIENTATION STATEMENT) Did not attend appointment · patients with serious mental illness It is very uncertain whether TELEPHONE PROMPTS changes did not attend appointment compared with TEXT‐BASED PROMPTS (ORIENTATION STATEMENT) (very low certainty). Prompts to encourage appointment attendance for people with serious mental illness (2001) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.93 [0.98, 3.8] | 1 study · 75 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompts to encourage appointment attendance for people with serious mental illness 2001 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.