Question · asked by 1 review

Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening: Cost‐effectiveness

Population
School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India
Intervention
Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist)
Comparison
No screening
Outcome
Cost‐effectiveness

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 3 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening
Cost effectiveness · School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
School dental screening programmes for oral health (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
As none of the studies reported cost-effectiveness, we could not assess the cost-benefit aspect of school dental screening.0 studiesNo studies found
Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening
Cost effectiveness · School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
School dental screening programmes for oral health (2019) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD012595.PUB3, superseded
None of the trials reported cost effectiveness of school dental screening programmes.0 studiesNo studies found
Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening
Cost effectiveness · School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
School dental screening programmes for oral health (2017) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD012595.PUB2, superseded
None of the trials reported cost effectiveness of school dental screening programmes.0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
School dental screening programmes for oral health
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-10Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.