Question · asked by 1 review
1055 to 1100 ppm F toothpaste vs 500 to 550 ppm F toothpaste: Adverse effects of toothpaste
- Population
- Young children with primary (deciduous) dentition (aged 1 to 6 years at study start)
- Intervention
- 1055 to 1100 ppm F toothpaste
- Comparison
- 500 to 550 ppm F toothpaste
- Outcome
- Adverse effects of toothpaste
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
1055 to 1100 ppm F toothpaste vs 500 to 550 ppm F toothpaste Adverse effects of toothpaste · Young children with primary (deciduous) dentition (aged 1 to 6 years at study start) · 12 months Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | Adverse effects of toothpaste: not estimable. "There were no reports on adverse effects, but some children complained about the taste of the dentifrice" (Cardoso 2014); 195 participants (1 RCT); low-certainty. | 1 study · 195 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-08 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.