Question · asked by 1 review
Physiotherapy vs minimal care: Oerlemans 1999 Disability as measured by the impairment level sum score (5 to 50) Higher scores indicate greater impairment Measured 12 months post recruitment
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Physiotherapy vs minimal care Oerlemans 1999 Disability as measured by the impairment level sum score (5 to 50) Higher scores indicate greater impairment Measured 12 months post recruitment · adults with CRPS I Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 91 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types I and II 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.