Self‐monitoring vs a different type of self‐monitoring: Perinatal mortality
- Population
- women with pre‐existing diabetes
- Intervention
- Self‐monitoring
- Comparison
- a different type of self‐monitoring
- Outcome
- Perinatal mortality
It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring changes perinatal mortality (stillbirth and neonatal mortality) compared with a different type of self‐monitoring (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Self‐monitoring vs a different type of self‐monitoring Perinatal mortality (stillbirth and neonatal mortality) · women with pre‐existing diabetes It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring changes perinatal mortality (stillbirth and neonatal mortality) compared with a different type of self‐monitoring (very low certainty). Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 3 [0.13, 67.91] | 1 study · 28 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Self‐monitoring vs periodic · women with gestational diabetes mellitus · 1 review
- Self‐monitoring vs usual care · women with pre‐existing diabetes · 0 reviews
- Self‐monitoring vs hospitalisation · women with pre‐existing diabetes · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.