Question · asked by 0 reviews

Low frequency ultrasound vs no ultrasound: Ulcers completely healed

It is very uncertain whether low frequency US changes proportion ulcers completely healed at 8 ‐ 12 weeks compared with no ultrasound (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Low frequency US vs no ultrasound
Proportion ulcers completely healed at 8 ‐ 12 weeks · patients with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether low frequency US changes proportion ulcers completely healed at 8 ‐ 12 weeks compared with no ultrasound (very low certainty).
Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers (2010) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD001180.PUB3, superseded
RR 3.91 [0.47, 32.85]2 studies · 61 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.