Question · asked by 1 review
Multiple-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs Single-surface ART with high-viscosity GIC: Restoration failure
- Population
- Children (2-9 years) with caries in posterior primary teeth
- Intervention
- Multiple-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer
- Comparison
- Single-surface ART with high-viscosity GIC
- Outcome
- Restoration failure
Multi-surface ART restorations had a high reported mean annual failure rate (17%; ungraded).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Multi-surface ART with high-viscosity GIC vs Single-surface ART with high-viscosity GIC Mean annual restoration failure rate · Children (2-9 years) with caries in posterior primary teeth · First 3 years, Multi-surface Multi-surface ART restorations had a high reported mean annual failure rate (17%; ungraded). Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. (2022) All outcomes | Mean annual failure rate (%) 17 | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. 2022 All outcomes | August 2020 | 35 | Low / Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.