Question · asked by 1 review
Relaxation and imagery training vs control (e.g. usual activities): Average pain scores (0-100 VAS)
- Population
- People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis
- Intervention
- Relaxation and imagery training
- Comparison
- control (e.g. usual activities)
- Outcome
- Average pain scores (0-100 VAS)
Relaxation and imagery training showed no clear difference in average pain scores (0-100 VAS) compared with control (treatment as usual); GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Relaxation and imagery training vs Control (treatment as usual) Average pain scores (0-100 VAS) · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis Relaxation and imagery training showed no clear difference in average pain scores (0-100 VAS) compared with control (treatment as usual); GRADE not reported. Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2010) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -8.22 [-21.79, 5.35] | 1 study · 46 participants | GRADE not reported |
Relaxation and imagery training vs Control (treatment as usual) Average pain scores (0-100 VAS) · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis Relaxation and imagery training showed no clear difference in average pain scores (0-100 VAS) compared with control (treatment as usual); GRADE not reported. Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD001973.PUB3, superseded | MD -8.22 [-21.79, 5.35] | 1 study · 46 participants | GRADE not reported |
Relaxation and imagery training vs Control (treatment as usual) Average pain scores (0-100 VAS) · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis Relaxation and imagery training showed no clear difference in average pain scores (0-100 VAS) compared with control (treatment as usual); GRADE not reported. Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2004) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD001973.PUB2, superseded | MD -8.22 [-21.79, 5.35] | 1 study · 46 participants | GRADE not reported |
Relaxation and imagery training vs Control (treatment as usual) Average pain scores (0-100 VAS) · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis Relaxation and imagery training showed no clear difference in average pain scores (0-100 VAS) compared with control (treatment as usual); GRADE not reported. Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2001) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD001973, superseded | MD -8.22 [-21.79, 5.35] | 1 study · 46 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment 2010 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2010-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.