Question · asked by 1 review
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy: Deviation of the mandible
- Population
- Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without reduction) whose symptoms and/or clinical signs had not improved after conservative therapy
- Intervention
- Arthrocentesis and lavage
- Comparison
- Arthroscopy
- Outcome
- Deviation of the mandible
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Arthrocentesis and lavage vs Arthroscopy Deviation of the mandible · Adults with temporomandibular joint disorders (internal derangement; anterior disc displacement with or without… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes | To date, no randomised controlled trial in this area reported deviation of the mandible. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-08 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.