Question · asked by 1 review

Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence): Periodontal disease prevalence

Population
Children (<18 years) with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in India
Intervention
Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Comparison
Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Outcome
Periodontal disease prevalence

In the single study reporting it, periodontal disease prevalence was 54.2% (single study; ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Not applicable (single-group prevalence) vs Not applicable (single-group prevalence)
Periodontal disease (prevalence) · Children (<18 years) with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in India · Rajasthan, India (institutionalized mentally handicapped children; Solanki et al. 2014)
In the single study reporting it, periodontal disease prevalence was 54.2% (single study; ungraded).
Oral health status of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities in India: a systematic… (2024) All outcomes
Prevalence 54.21 study · 72 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral health status of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
Earliest available date to 31 March 202429Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.