Continuous glucose monitoring system vs self‐monitoring of glucose: Hypoglycaemia
It is very uncertain whether continuous glucose monitoring system changes hypoglycaemia compared with self‐monitoring of glucose (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Continuous glucose monitoring system vs self‐monitoring of glucose Hypoglycaemia · women with gestational diabetes mellitus It is very uncertain whether continuous glucose monitoring system changes hypoglycaemia compared with self‐monitoring of glucose (very low certainty). Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.79 [0.35, 1.78] | 2 studies · 179 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.