Question · asked by 1 review

Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs vs placebo or no treatment: Aqueous tear production

Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs (ie, EPA and DHA) showed no clear difference in change in Schirmer test (aqueous tear production, measured in mm/5… compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs (ie, EPA and DHA) vs placebo or no treatment
Change in Schirmer test (aqueous tear production, measured in mm/5 min, with higher scores indicating more tear production) at 1‐month (with actual · people with dry eyea
Oral long‐chain omega‐3 PUFAs (ie, EPA and DHA) showed no clear difference in change in Schirmer test (aqueous tear production, measured in mm/5… compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.687 studies · 1730 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.