Question · asked by 1 review
Active vs expectant management of the third stage of labour (all women): Very severe primary PPH (clinically estimated or measured blood loss ≥ to 2500 mL at time of birth)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Active vs expectant management of the third stage of labour (all women) Very severe primary PPH (clinically estimated or measured blood loss ≥ 2500 mL at time of birth) · all women who expected a vaginal birth at 24 weeks' gestation or later and their babies Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.