Question · asked by 1 review
Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty: All‐cause mortality
- Population
- people aged 65 years and older living with frailty
- Intervention
- Case management for integrated care
- Comparison
- usual care of older people living with frailty
- Outcome
- All‐cause mortality
Case management for integrated care showed no clear difference in mortality compared with usual care of older people living with frailty (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty Mortality · people aged 65 years and older living with frailty Case management for integrated care showed no clear difference in mortality compared with usual care of older people living with frailty (low certainty). Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.98 [0.84, 1.15] | 14 studies · 9924 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.