CHG‐IPA vs PI: Mortality before hospital discharge
- Population
- neonates that require central line
- Intervention
- CHG‐IPA
- Comparison
- PI
- Outcome
- Mortality before hospital discharge
CHG‐IPA showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality throughout the hospital admission of the… compared with PI (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CHG‐IPA vs PI All‐cause mortality throughout the hospital admission of the participant (mortality) · neonates that require central line CHG‐IPA showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality throughout the hospital admission of the… compared with PI (low certainty). Antiseptic solutions for skin preparation during central catheter insertion in neonates (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.88 [0.46, 1.68] | 1 study · 304 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antiseptic solutions for skin preparation during central catheter insertion in neonates 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- CHG‐IPA vs CHG‐A · neonates that require central line · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.