Question · asked by 1 review

Two-phase oil-water mouthrinse (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride) vs Essential oils mouthrinse (Listerine): Volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), gas chromatography

Population
Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g. diabetes) or refractory/severe chronic periodontal disease
Intervention
Two-phase oil-water mouthrinse (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride)
Comparison
Essential oils mouthrinse (Listerine)
Outcome
Volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), gas chromatography

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Two-phase oil-water mouthrinse (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride) vs Essential oils mouthrinse (Listerine)
Peak volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) · Adults over 18 years with a clinical or self-assessed diagnosis of halitosis, without significant comorbidity (e.g.… · 6 weeks
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis (2008) · Cochrane All outcomes
Kozlovsky 1996: peak VSC (ppb). Two-phase oil-water (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride): 94 (SD 36) at baseline to 56 (SD 10) at week 6 (less than 40% reduction); Control essential oils (Listerine): 79 (SD 40) to 56 (SD…1 study · 50 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis
2008 · Cochrane All outcomes
2008-08Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.