Psychological interventions (including health education) vs usual care: Return to work
Psychological interventions (including health education) showed no clear difference in proportion of participants at work in the long term (> 1 to < 5 years) compared with usual care (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Psychological interventions (including health education) vs usual care Proportion of participants at work in the long term (> 1 to < 5 years) · people with coronary heart disease Psychological interventions (including health education) showed no clear difference in proportion of participants at work in the long term (> 1 to < 5 years) compared with usual care (low certainty). Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.09 [0.88, 1.34] | 3 studies · 239 participants | Low |
Psychological interventions (including health education) vs usual care Days until return to work · people with coronary heart disease Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 125 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.