Question · asked by 1 review
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes: Postnatal depression ‐ not measured
- Population
- women diagnosed with gestational diabetes; 11 to 33 weeks' gestation; singleton pregnancy
- Intervention
- Glibenclamide
- Comparison
- acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes
- Outcome
- Postnatal depression ‐ not measured
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Glibenclamide vs acarbose ‐ maternal outcomes Postnatal depression ‐ not reported · women diagnosed with gestational diabetes; 11 to 33 weeks' gestation; singleton pregnancy The review found no eligible studies for this question. Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.