Contract referral vs expedited partner therapy: Re‐infection in index patient
Contract referral showed no clear difference in re‐infection in index patient compared with expedited partner therapy (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Contract referral vs expedited partner therapy Re‐infection in index patient Contract referral showed no clear difference in re‐infection in index patient compared with expedited partner therapy (low certainty). Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 2 [0.7, 5.72] | 1 study · 322 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.