Question · asked by 1 review

Surfactant administration via thin catheter (S‐TC) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT): Death or survival with neurosensory disability ‐ not reported

Population
preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome
Intervention
Surfactant administration via thin catheter (S‐TC)
Comparison
surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)
Outcome
Death or survival with neurosensory disability ‐ not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Surfactant administration via thin catheter (S‐TC) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)
Death or survival with neurosensory disability ‐ not reported · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Surfactant therapy via thin catheter in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Surfactant therapy via thin catheter in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.