Question · asked by 1 review

Opal Seal fluoride-releasing adhesive vs Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control: White spot lesion rate and volume

Population
Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
Intervention
Opal Seal fluoride-releasing adhesive
Comparison
Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control
Outcome
White spot lesion rate and volume

Opal Seal showed no significant difference in WSL rate or volume, with certainty not graded.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Opal Seal fluoride-releasing adhesive vs Transbond XT conventional adhesive
White spot lesion rate and volume · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 8 weeks after bonding, Fixed orthodontic treatment
Opal Seal showed no significant difference in WSL rate or volume, with certainty not graded.
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
The WSL volume was lower in the Opal Seal group than in the Clearfil and Transbond XT groups, but there was no significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05).1 study · 15 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.