Question · asked by 1 review
Wax (fluid wax), two stage-two step selective pressure final impression vs Polysulfide rubber (elastomer): Oral health-related quality of life
- Population
- Completely edentulous people
- Intervention
- Wax (fluid wax), two stage-two step selective pressure final impression
- Comparison
- Polysulfide rubber (elastomer)
- Outcome
- Oral health-related quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Wax (fluid wax), two stage-two step selective pressure final impression vs Polysulfide rubber (elastomer) Participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) · Completely edentulous people The review found no eligible studies for this question. Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | Not measured | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.