Question · asked by 0 reviews
Rubber dam isolation and moisture control (alone or with saliva aspiration) vs Alternative isolation/moisture control, e.g. cotton rolls (with or without same active treatment): Restoration survival
- Population
- Dental patients undergoing direct or indirect restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction)
- Intervention
- Rubber dam isolation and moisture control (alone or with saliva aspiration)
- Comparison
- Alternative isolation/moisture control, e.g. cotton rolls (with or without same active treatment)
- Outcome
- Restoration survival
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rubber dam isolation and moisture control (alone or with saliva aspiration) vs Alternative isolation/moisture control, e.g. cotton rolls (with or without same active treatment) Survival rate of the restorations · Dental patients undergoing direct or indirect restorative treatment (no age or gender restriction) · 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 years The review found no eligible studies for this question. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients (2012) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD009858, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Rubber dam isolation and moisture control (alone or with saliva aspiration) vs Cotton rolls (with or without saliva aspiration) · Dental patients undergoing direct or indirect restorative treatment (no age or gender… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.